Sonata for Piano

 

The Sonata for Piano was written and dedicated to the Polish-born pianist Adam Wodnicki. The work is an exploration of weight and tension of individual intervals, specifically the interval of a 4th and 5th. These close harmonic intervals serve as unifying factors throughout all 4 movements of the Sonata. The performer will find classically formal structure including cadences which are still quite goal oriented, yet the harmonic structure is presented in a free and at times “atonal” framework.


click for larger view

The first movement is presented in compound ternary form. This form allows for more diverse contrasting moods than traditional ternary form . Clear and definite statements of contrasting sections serve to make this movement classically oriented in it’s large sectional structure.


click for larger view

The 2nd section is presented in a clearly defined ternary form. The opening theme is developed in a mono-thematic character that would be commonly found in fugal repetitions. The opening theme has a simple and narrow rhythmic compass that generates larger scale statements later in the movement. The contrasting middle section should be quite controlled and expressive elements should be emphasized when playing the counterpoint between both hands.


click for larger view

This is the most rhythmically developed movement of the entire Sonata. A percussive approach at times with an emphasis on strict tempo is needed to provide unity throughout the movement. The coda serves as a high point both rhythmically and dynamically and also defines a clear change in texture which serves to introduce the fugue presented in the last movement.


click for larger view

Subject entries are clearly defined throughout this movement. Episodes serve as the tool for thematic development and are stated briefly or as a transitional element between restatements of fugal themes. Free manipulation of the subject material of episodes also provides tonal movement and direction throughout the fugue. Traditional applications of the fugal structure include fragmentation and both diminished and augmented sequences of the original fugal statement.


Harmonic movement becomes quite stagnant during this section. An emphasis of creating an atmosphere which is quite inconclusive is the direction the performer should be focused on. The harmonic structure is built on the rotation of intervals of 4ths and 5ths to add to the eeriness of character.


click for larger view

This section contrasts wide jumps between notes and an underlying songful quality using stepwise motion. The contrasts are striking , yet compliment each other with a common rhythmic jauntiness.


click for larger view

This expressive theme is expansive as far as range of tonalities. Harmonic centers are quite simply based on tonic and dominant tonal centers. (F-C#). This allows the melody an opportunity to explore and expand until it’s resolution which is found in the last measure.


click for larger view

This example shows a clear interruption of harmonic texture. Decisive breaks within the form of the movement help to give cadence-like episodes that extend and also define large-scale sections of the movement.


click for larger view

This dramatic ending section serves as a final statement of the rhythmically oriented thematic material that has been presented earlier in the movement. This coda defines a clearly defined extension through repetition, Although traditional harmonic elements are present, the tonal center is not a priority, rhythmic density is emphasized here to help create a percussive-like highpoint to the movement.


click for larger view

The last measure of this example is an example of “stretto” or the overlapping of subject entries common to fugal form.. Rhythmically, the statements are quite similar, but the overlapping effect adds an element of tension leading to the final cadence of the fugue.


click for larger view

Please contact the composer for performance scores.

 

 

Copyright © Timothy Brown. All rights reserved.